Walmart’s New Patent Could Mean No Privacy on Premises

Walmart’s New Patent Could Mean No Privacy on Premises

We usually discuss how a business can help keep itself more secure. Unfortunately, this time we have reason to discuss the potential for a business to undermine the privacy of its own customers and staff.

Walmart recently applied for a patent for a new surveillance technology that, buried in the jargon, holds many details that undermine the security of every customer and employee who works there.

What the Patent Says

This patent, titled “ Listening to the Frontend ,” illustrates a new development in data collection that Walmart may or may not ever implement, but either way hints at how technology can be abused as easily as it can be leveraged. Listening to the Frontend illustrates and describes a system for recording the interactions between a customer and an employee as they interact at the checkout line.

According to the patent, this system is intended to assist Walmart in cutting back costs and increasing their customers’ satisfaction levels. As patent US010020004 states, “Tracking performance metrics for employees to ensure that the employees are performing their jobs efficiently and correctly can aid in achieving these cost savings and increases in guest satisfaction.”

The patent goes on to describe how certain sounds can be leveraged to determine assorted performance metrics, like how efficiently an employee is bagging merchandise based on beeps and rustles, how long lines are based on the distance between different customers talking in line and the sensors at the terminal, and whether or not an employee is properly greeting guests.

So, despite a statement insisting that Walmart would not be listening to the content of the audio, Listening to the Front end itself states that the system would be able to “process the audio of the conversations to determine whether the employee stationed at the terminal is greeting  guests.”

The patent goes on to specify that “If however the performance metric is based on the content of the conversation (e.g., was a specific greeting used or script followed), the system can process the audio detected by the sound sensors 102 (e.g., using speech recognition) to determine the performance metric.”

Why is Walmart Doing This?

In a word, profits. According to the patent, the whole idea is to establish performance metrics that can then be used to optimize how Walmart’s point-of-sale can be made more efficient, and from there, it isn’t a long stretch to reach “more profitable.” To which one may say, “Fine, fair enough.” They may not like it, but if the only influence is that it gets a shopper home that much faster, it will more than likely be accepted as the new status quo.

After all, what harm is it really doing?

However, Ifeoma Ajunwa, who is an assistant professor at the Industrial and Labor Relations School at Cornell, had plenty to say about the potential damage this system could cause.

First, let’s return to the fact that Walmart’s workers have no union by which to protect their rights including their right to privacy in the workplace. This means that, if Walmart could prove that listening to the Front end was in no way meant to be discriminatory and was “nothing personal, it’s just business” (a phrase attributed to criminal accountant Otto Berman, by the way), they could easily have the systems installed, without having to even inform their employees.

So let’s assume that these systems were initially put in place to measure efficiency. However, Professor Ajunwa’s concern then becomes especially real. Her concerns, outlined in the study Limitless Worker Surveillance , included such phenomenon as “mission creep.”

Mission Creep

Listening to the Frontend is currently on record as being intended to serve as a productivity tool, analyzing the situation at hand and alerting workers that there needs to be a quick change in the workflow – is a line getting too long? Better open up more checkout aisles!

However, mission creep could swiftly turn the technology’s use away from that purpose and to a new one. Mission creep is simply an admittedly ominous way of saying that this kind of tech could easily be repurposed to do different things after it has been installed.

For instance, the technology described in Listening to the Front end could easily be re-purposed to be a way of keeping an eye on employees to always be evaluating their performance.

So, if a cashier is getting too chatty and their lines tend to be longer, this technology could presumably be used to collect the data needed to justify some sort of punishment – and as a result, a friendly employee could suddenly find their hours cut back, or even learn that they had just been fired.

Other Effects of Surveillance

Ajunwa also explained that, as one might imagine, constant workplace surveillance can often have a negative effect on productivity, despite the technology’s intent. Often, it can create feelings of distrust and discontent toward an employer, as well as hamper creative thought and ironically, efficiency. Haven’t you ever found that you work much slower when you’re being watched?

Don’t get us wrong, if increased efficiency is truly Walmart’s goal, power to them for trying to improve the customer experience while enhancing their own bottom line – it’s just that they are going about it in arguably the worst way possible.

The Right Way to Keep Watch

Frankly, this should be a bit of a no-brainer, but if you intend on monitoring your employees’ behavior on your network during work hours, make that announcement part of the job interview, and remind your employees of it often.

Be clear and open from the beginning about the consequences of misusing company resources, and stay true to your word. Walmart’s big problem isn’t that they’ll be listening, it’s that they’ll most likely be listening without letting anyone know – and that’s where the invasion of privacy concerns come into play.

Frankly, there are plenty of valid reasons that you will want to be able to see how your employees are using the technology you’ve provided them to use on company time. After all, it’s one thing to check social media while on a break, but you don’t want them shopping online when they’re there to be working, either, or watching some silly viral video.

WheelHouse IT can help you keep the balance between too much and too little oversight.

If you’re ready to be open with your employees about what you plan to do in your business to ensure security and efficiency, and you’re ready to implement it, give us a call at (877) 771-2384.

We’re here to help you run a fair and proper business with the help of our technology solutions.

Contact Us Today and Check Out Our Blog!

Safe Surfing: Can You Tell if Your Browsing is Secured?

Safe Surfing: Can You Tell if Your Browsing is Secured?

When it comes to safe surfing, your choice of browser can easily impact your security, as each handles how it informs you whether or not your connection is encrypted differently.

This is especially important to recognize, especially when the Chrome browser will soon run counter to the advice users have received for quite some time.

How Chrome is Shaking Up the Conventional Advice

There are two different kinds of websites that use hypertext transfer protocol to deliver content. The first, HTTP, lacks the security that the “S” in HTTPS signifies. If your URL does include HTTPS, it means that the data that you input into the website is protected by encryption measures, keeping it safe from any prying eyes. Historically, this meant that best practices demanded that a user check for a padlock icon in the URL to be sure their browsing was secure.

However, Google is finally acting on a promise to take the opposite tack and instead label those websites that haven’t taken the time to encrypt their communications with their host server. The hope is that this will pressure websites to adopt HTTPS, especially seeing that Chrome is the most commonly-used browser. This approach has been lauded by security pros.

What Other Browsers are Doing for Safe Surfing

The remaining three of the big four browsers, Safari, Firefox, and Edge, also have plans to change things about their approach to security, but not all of them have plans to flip the script entirely.

Firefox

While Firefox will very likely follow in Chrome’s footsteps at some point, as of right now it still subscribes to the “confirming the page is secure” approach.

However, Firefox also alerts the user if a HTTP page contains a login form by displaying a padlock with a strike-through in the URL, and by adding a warning that displays when the cursor moves over one of the fields. There are also plans to make all HTTP pages display the strike-through padlock, no login forms required.

Safari

As of yet, Apple has stuck with tradition, in that they will confirm that a website’s connection is secured through a digital certificate and encryption. However, it is also important to recognize that Apple has also taken additional steps to ensure security, albeit different ones.

For example, if a user is on an HTTP page and tries to input login credentials or other sensitive data, the browser will alert them in a similar way as Firefox will, alerts popping up both at the field in question and in the URL bar.

Edge

Again, like Apple, Edge only informs a user when a page is protected, although there is the option to access additional information that explains that the user’s connection isn’t encrypted and could therefore pose some risk.

However, this does not extend to input fields on HTTP sites, so you will not be warned before inputting sensitive information into these fields.

In today’s day and age, it is crucial that your business remains secure. Paying attention to the security of the websites you frequent is just one part of that. For assistance with the rest of your cybersecurity, reach out to WheelHouse IT at (877) 771-2384.

Contact Us Today and Check Out Our Blog!